1917 Joint Mexican American Committee Concludes
The Joint Committee between the US and Mexico concluded its business.
With the agreement of December 24, 1916 having been made, with Carranza
having refused to sign it, and with events overcoming the United States
that would give Carranza the result he wanted anyway, there was no more
work to be done.
Porfirio Diaz in full military costume. The collapse of his rule lead to the long civil war in Mexico.
Some have stated that the mere existence of the Joint Committee was a
success in and of itself, and there is some truth to that. The
committee worked for months on an agreement and came to one, and even if
Carranza would not execute it as it didn't guaranty the withdraw of
American forces, the fact that the country was now hurtling towards war
with Germany made it necessary for that to occur without American formal
assent to Carranza's demand. By not agreeing to it, the US was not
bound not to intervene again, which was one of the points that it had
sought in the first place. Events essentially gave both nations what
they had been demanding.
Even if that was the case this step, the first in the beginning of the
end of the event we have been tracking since March, has to be seen as a
Mexican Constitutionalist victory in the midst of the Mexican
Revolution. At the time the Commission came to the United States it
represented only one side in a three way (sometimes more) Mexican civil
war that was still raging. Even as Carranza demanded that the United
States withdraw his forces were not uniformly doing well against either
Villa or Zapata. Disdaining the United States in general, in spite of
the fact that Wilson treated his government as the de facto government,
he also knew that he could not be seen to be achieving victory over
Villa through the intervention of the United States, nor could he be
seen to be allowing a violation of Mexican sovereignty. His refusal to
acquiesce to allowing American troops to cross the border in pursuit of
raiders, something that the Mexican and American governments had allowed
for both nations since the mid 19th Century, allowed him to be seen as a
legitimate defender of Mexican sovereignty and as the legitimate head
of a Mexican government.
1919 January 17, 1919. Fake News
I've been impressed, by and large, by how quickly the papers of a century ago reported the news, and often how accurately.
But that wasn't always the case.
Such was the case regarding the murder of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht.
We've already touched on this story, but what I didn't realize, and in fact what's contrary to the way the story tends to be reported now, their murder was known have occurred almost immediately after it occurred. I thought it took a period of days, but not so.
But the story surrounding that murder was completely false.
Their murders did add fuel to the Communist flames, as the Casper paper reported, but it certainly wasn't at the hand of the Berlin populace, as seemingly all papers reported that day. There was no Berliner storming of the lobby of a hotel where they were staying. No mob clubbed Liebknecht and lynched Luxemburg (although her body was thrown in a canal). No, indeed, the story was ludicrous given that Berlin had the reputation of being a far left city at the time. . . Red Berlin.
As we know, they were killed by the Freikorps, under orders of a Freikorps Captain Waldemar Pabst, formerly an officer of the German Imperial Army. Liebknecht was clubbed to death with a rifle butt. Luxemburg was shot. Both were tortured. But not by a crowd of Berliners.
How did the contrary story get started? I don't know, but I have to suspect it was a planted story to cover up the murder.
But that wasn't always the case.
Such was the case regarding the murder of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht.
We've already touched on this story, but what I didn't realize, and in fact what's contrary to the way the story tends to be reported now, their murder was known have occurred almost immediately after it occurred. I thought it took a period of days, but not so.
But the story surrounding that murder was completely false.
Their murders did add fuel to the Communist flames, as the Casper paper reported, but it certainly wasn't at the hand of the Berlin populace, as seemingly all papers reported that day. There was no Berliner storming of the lobby of a hotel where they were staying. No mob clubbed Liebknecht and lynched Luxemburg (although her body was thrown in a canal). No, indeed, the story was ludicrous given that Berlin had the reputation of being a far left city at the time. . . Red Berlin.
As we know, they were killed by the Freikorps, under orders of a Freikorps Captain Waldemar Pabst, formerly an officer of the German Imperial Army. Liebknecht was clubbed to death with a rifle butt. Luxemburg was shot. Both were tortured. But not by a crowd of Berliners.
How did the contrary story get started? I don't know, but I have to suspect it was a planted story to cover up the murder.
1920 January 17, 1920. And then the entire nation was dry forever. . .
or so it seemed.
The Wyoming State Tribune, which was united with the rest of the press in seeing Prohibition as a great advance, counselled that eternal vigilance would be necessary to keep the nation dry.
An article in Colliers already used the term "moonshine" in connection with bootleg liquor, and featured this illustration with a young boy confronting "Revenues".
The Wyoming State Tribune, which was united with the rest of the press in seeing Prohibition as a great advance, counselled that eternal vigilance would be necessary to keep the nation dry.
An article in Colliers already used the term "moonshine" in connection with bootleg liquor, and featured this illustration with a young boy confronting "Revenues".
1930 Kendall Wyoming hits -52F.
1933 A Baggs school-bell was rung in the Bells of Hope Presidential Inauguration celebration. Attribution: Wyoming State Historical Society.
1955 The 141st Medium Tank Battalion, Wyoming Army National Guard, which had been mobilized due to the Korean War, but which was not sent overseas, was deactivated.
No comments:
Post a Comment