tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3378211050101354121.post1673816226253660430..comments2022-08-04T12:16:39.636-06:00Comments on Today In Wyoming's History: February 1Pat Hhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05085914852278228313noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3378211050101354121.post-35517340525146528682013-02-01T13:52:49.131-07:002013-02-01T13:52:49.131-07:00Lebhart was a Court Reporter in Laramie. From tha...Lebhart was a Court Reporter in Laramie. From that, we can tell that this was Exhibit 1 in some sort of court proceeding, either a trial, grand jury, or a coroner's inquest. Grand juries are pretty rare in Wyoming, so it was likely a trial or an inquest.<br /><br />I can't find who Pajolis was, or haven't so far anyhow. The "O. F" is curious, as that tells us something about the exhibit. My guess is that introduction of the exhibit was objected to on the basis of lack of foundation; "Objection, Foundation." If that's right, the bullet was probably an exhibit at a trial.<br /><br />It's odd that it would have ended up as personal property. Exhibits are part of the court record until disposed of by the court, which they occasionally are. I wouldn't expect the reporter to have retained it, so perhaps it ended up as property of an attorney.Pat Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05085914852278228313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3378211050101354121.post-62711922866455665772013-02-01T13:08:30.829-07:002013-02-01T13:08:30.829-07:00In an estate a friend found a bullet labeled "...In an estate a friend found a bullet labeled " Bullet that killed Pete Pajolis, Laramie Wy. Feb 3 1929". The back of the tag is typed "Exh. No. 1 O.F. Fred C Lebhart Reporter". It is almost Feb 3! Can you find out anything about Pete? Thank you.<br />Judi Myers<br />PinedaleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com